Re-creating a show is a challenge for any director, but when that show
is a nearly-forgotten flop by one of Broadway's greatest teams, it's
doubly demanding. Fortunately for fans of John Kander and Fred Ebb,
Michael Unger, the director of Signature Theater's recent revival of The Happy Time,
not only had the bravery to take on a challenging show, he had the
patience and dedication to give the 40-year-old musical a new lease on
life.
John Kander and Michael Unger had worked together on the Broadway production of Steel Pier, and on a revival of The Rink
at the Cape Playhouse. "I substantially reworked the script with
Terrence McNally and John
Kander," he recalls of the latter experience, "and created a new
version that had never been seen before." After the production earned
positive reviews, John Kander had
only one director in mind when Eric Schaeffer selected The Happy Time
for Signature's Kander and Ebb Celebration. "Whenever I call John to
thank him, he'd just say, 'I'm just taking care
of myself,'" Unger says. He has nothing but praise for Kander, who was
involved in the remounting of this early work. "He is the most
selfless, generous, down-to-earth, lovely
human being you'll ever meet in any business anywhere. He's a very
special person, and I was so honored to have that experience to work on
The Rink with him. When he was in the room, I never wanted those
rehearsals to end. And here I am getting a second chance!"
Perhaps the greatest hurdle in remounting The Happy Time
is the fact that it has yet to enjoy a successful commercial run. "This
is not one of Kander & Ebb's biggest hits," Unger admits
decorously,
calling the story "intimate," "tender" and "personal." Based on a play
by Samuel Taylor, the musical follows the impact a photographer's
return home has on his family, community, and the girl he left behind.
"The heart of it is family," Unger says, noting that in many scenes,
three generations of the central family are onstage at once. "Everyone
can relate to the tension in this family," he says. "The prodigal son
returns, and not without conflict... We
all can relate to that."
While the original 1968 Broadway production earned several Tony Awards,
Kander, Ebb and librettist N. Richard Nash were not happy with director
Gower Champion's vision for it. "He made the show a little larger than
they wanted it to be," Unger recalls. "The production concept was based
on projections-- as is ours, but back
then, when you had no video or digital photography and computerized
this 'n' that, you'd have to project from behind on an RP screen, you'd
have a lot of distance, which pushes the set very far downstage, and
coordinating it would have been a technical nightmare without the
digital age. So back then, it seemed like the projections took over the
production, Kander felt, to the production's detriment." Modern
technology was able to help realize that original vision in a way that
was impossible 40 years ago. "In the version
of the script that we got, there are no projections," Unger says, "and
I said to
John, 'This is the story of a photographer; will you allow me to use
projections if I promise not to let it overwhelm the production?' And
he said yes. So we have put that back in the show, but I think in a
very integrated way."
The Signature
production also restores three songs that were, metaphorically
speaking, lost in Boston, and adds the song "Running," written for the
recent Goodspeed Opera House production. "And the three songs that
Gower had cut, John very much wanted back in
the show," Unger says. "It spreads the wealth of musical material among
the
supporting players." In combining the original Broadway script with the
Goodspeed version, Unger and Kander brought out the best moments in
each. "I was looking for a scene that would help solidify Jacques'
commitment to stay," Unger recalls, "and he
had forgotten that the Broadway version had that exact scene. And my
music director David Holcenberg was flipping through the script, and
he says, 'Hey, wait, isn't this what you were looking
for?'"
Of
the 17 cast members, only two are from Broadway. The leading roles of
Jacques and Grandpere went to Michael Minarik and David Margulies,
respectively. "I always feel pleased when people I bring in do well,
and I brought in
both David and Michael," Unger says happily. "There was something
about Michael's connection to the character that was very authentic.
And I always try to cast someone who has a lot of the role in them so
that they're not reaching to create a character." And while David
Margulies is not famous for musicals, "he's actually got incredible
pitch," Unger says. But more than that, he was the right actor for the
part, able to balance the joie de vivre and disappointment of the character. "You've gotta cast the actor, especially in a piece like this," Unger says,
"'cause there are some major scenes, and there's a lot of book material,
and he was absolutely hands-down the actor for this role."
The remaining fifteen actors are all from Washington's admirable pool
of talent, which led to some unique casting. Rob McQuay, for example,
who plays the protagonist's brother Louis, is well-known as a fine
musical theatre performer in DC, having starred in such musicals as Evita, Ragtime, Godspell and Jesus Christ Superstar.
He has also been paraplegic for eighteen years. "This guy comes in in a
wheelchair, and he's incredibly talented," Unger says, remembering
McQuay's audition. "I said to John, 'This guy is the best man for the
role. He's a very
strong actor; he's a great singer. Would you approve these little
rewrites to make it work for a person in a wheelchair?' And he said,
'Absolutely!'" With Kander's blessing, all references to the character
walking were removed, and the role was reconfigured for McQuay to play.
"It was so enlightening for me, because it's not a role written for
that
kind of actor, and he brought such a complete performance, I can't
really see it done any other way. When the understudy goes on, he'll be
in a wheelchair."
Ultimately, Unger says, re-creating The Happy Time
was "a matter of just finding the temperature of the piece." Had Nash
and Ebb been alive, he admits, he would have liked to have refined the
script further and continued to polish it. "There are very few perfect
musical books in the world," Unger says with a laugh. "This is not one
of them, but we did a lot of work to improve it. It's hard to write a
musical!"
Videos