I came across this video compilation of the some of the reviews of this short-lived flop and I'm really intrigued. I remember reading about this show in Ken Mandelbaum's book a few years ago. Judging from this video, it looked like it was an hilariously bad piece of work!
Don't believe the critics- they are all ignorant! It was spectacular- far too good for the common swine to appreciate. We need a revival ASAP- but it will, of course, not be NEARLY as good as this incandescent production was.
I saw it in previews, and I liked it WAY more than I expected. It had some embarrassing flaws, but it also had a riveting central performance by Dean Jones, and some compelling music and story along the way.
It wasn't "brilliant" but it didn't "suck" either.
Is there such a thing as a third option?
I don't think so in this bipolar world we live in.
The night I saw it in previews (yes, I saw it live; a friend had comped me), the mime was wearing traditional whiteface, à la Marcel Marceau. Near the top of the second act, Danny Gerard (the neglected little boy whose only friend was the imaginary mime) wandered onstage, followed by the mime. A huge audible groan rolled over the house, accompanied by boos and catcalls, topped by someone in the orchestra who shouted at the stage:
joined:5/2/05
Posted: 12/28/12 at 03:47pm