What's a show you attended, hated the first act, and considered leaving at intermission, only to have it all come together at the conclusion, making you glad you soldiered through it?
I ask because I saw a show tonight (that I won't name so as not to derail the topic) where I was tempted to leave at intermission, and I probably should have. As I thought more, there aren't many times where I stuck through it and felt like I was rewarded for my patience.
Wait...you started a thread on something to which you cannot contribute?
I cannot think of any time where Act II has been able to overcome the atrocities (or my lack of enjoyment) of Act I. If I'm considering leaving -- it is past the point of no return.
If we're not having fun, then why are we doing it?
These are DISCUSSION boards, not mutual admiration boards. Discussion only occurs when we are willing to hear what others are thinking, regardless of whether it is alignment to our own thoughts.
I didn't almost leave Giant at the Public, but thought it was just all right at the intermission and by the end of the second act, was moved to tears and really loved the piece...
I think one should NEVER leave a show after Act I. You owe it to yourself and the creative team to "stick it out".
That said ... one might have been tempted to bail on "Follies", since the pace was rather deadly (esp. the latest incarnation). What a mistake! For those of us who had never seen it before, "Loveland" was amazing. If one left early, imagine having missed Danny and Jan and even Bernadette-losing-her-mind.
I have never left a show at intermission. In for a penny, in for a pound.
And if you liked Loveland in the recent revival, you should have seen the original. The scene change was one of the most theatrical moments I have ever scene. And Gene Nelson! Wow.
Grey Gardens bored us during Act 1, and we were also all the way up in the balcony, which made it worse. Vast improvement in Act 2... with some better seats, too. Glad we didn't leave.
Too bad I can't say the same for LoveMusik... we were hoping for the same thing to happen.
Wait...you started a thread on something to which you cannot contribute?
Isn't that the point of asking a question on a message board? To see if others have knowledge/experiences that you don't have?
I think one should NEVER leave a show after Act I. You owe it to yourself and the creative team to "stick it out".
I tend to act that way, too. However, I'm reminded of the idea of "sunk costs" (the money you paid for the seat is irrelevant once you're in the theater, the cost of staying for Act II is your additional time/patience), and if very few people have come up with instances where they're happy they stuck it out, isn't that evidence that we may be wasting our time if we hated Act I?
In my personal opinion, one cannot really comment on a show if you've only seen half. I'm not saying that things tend to get monumentally better if you're sitting through a train wreck, but the idea of seeing half a show is so bizarre to me. Even if it's awful, I'd rather see the entire production and be able to speak to what I saw than ditch.
I've only ever left before a show was over once, and that was on two comp tickets to "Rain". After the first 10 minutes, we both had absolutely no interest in sitting through the rest, and since we hadn't invested much time or money into it, and were sitting on the outside aisle, we snuck out and went to Chipotle instead. Much better use of time.
I saw "Spamalot" in Dallas in 2010. I left the show during intermission, as I found that particular British humor quite tiresome. I did enjoy "The Lady of the Lake" though. from RC in Austin, Texas
Visiting New York City for the seventh time from June 7-10, 2013. Shows I'll be seeing: Friday, June 7th: "Chicago", Saturday, June 8th @ 2pm: "The Nance", "Pippin": 8pm and Sunday, June 9th: "Vanya, Sonia, Masha and Spike": 2pm.
You owe it to yourself and the creative team to "stick it out".
No.
All I owe the creative team is the price of the ticket. That really is all. They're not doing me a favor by allowing me to see their work.
And all I owe myself is my happiness. If a miserable piece of bad theatre is making me unhappy, I owe it to myself to leave and do something that will make me happy.
Act II of The Addams Family was better than Act I because they dropped the thin plot and just did their own party pieces.
For me it has to be Caryl Churchill's "Easy Money" at Wyndhams Theatre, London in 1987. The show was told in rhyming couplets which took some time to get used to, however, it was the strong language that put many people off and quite a few left the theatre in the first ten minutes or so. Act 1 ended with a song by Ian Dury, every other word of which was the C word. Only about half the audience returned to their seats after the intermission - the entire row in front of me was empty apart from the man directly in front of me who just happened to be Topol. Strangely, the second act was so much better than the first, everything that had seemed puzzling was explained. I left the theatre at the end of the show thinking how good and clever the whole thing had been.
hotjohn -Do you mean Caryl Churchill's SERIOUS Money?? I do agree. Sat there at intermission thinking WTF is THIS all about?! Was really pleased with it by the end.
Starlight Express bored me to tears. I thought of leaving at intermission. I asked the usher if Act two were better. She said yes. I stuck it out. Act two was a bad as act one. I should have left. This was in London.
I've never left a show at intermission but I considered it at the first intermission of Gore Vidal's "The Best Man". Honestly, I hate politics but I wanted to see it for the cast (i know...). I didn't really understand the plot since I could barely pay attention due to being so bored but by the end I actually enjoyed it and was glad I stayed.
I recently saw "Jekyll and Hyde" at the Kennedy Center, in DC. Though well-acted and well-sung, the story was trite and the music boring. I stayed and no, it did not improve.
A few weeks ago, I saw "Phantom" for the fifth time (seventh, if you count twice in Las Vegas, but the Vegas version didn't have an intermission). Two women nearby, who did not seem to speak English, left after the first act. The other people sitting near me were incredulous -- who leaves "Phantom" in the middle, even if they don't understand the words? My theory is that the ladies thought the show was over when the chandelier fell.
Neil Patrick Harris to Star in HEDWIG on Bway in Spring 2014!
INTO THE WOODS Film to Hit Theaters Christmas Day 2014!
Bullock in Talks to Play 'Miss Hannigan' in ANNIE Film
NBC Reveals SMASH For Your Consideration Emmy Bids
MISS SAIGON Revival to Open in London in 2014
VIDEO: Brad Pitt & JIMMY FALLON Have 'Yodeling' Conversation from NY Rooftops
Shailene Woodley Cut from AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2; Marc Webb to Recast Mary Jane?
Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana Sentenced to 20 Months in Prison for Tax Evasion
BWW CD Reviews: Andrea McArdle's 70'S AND SUNNY - LIVE AT 54 BELOW is a Fabulous Throwback to the 70s
That's a Lot of iPads - Apple Awarded $30 Million iPad Deal From LA Unified School District
STAGE TUBE: First Look at Highlights of BECOMING TRAVIATA Starring Natalie Dessay
BWW Blog: Claire van Bever - The Auditions Tips You HAVEN'T Heard
A DANCER'S DREAM: TWO WORKS BY STRAVINSKY to be Distributed to Worldwide Cinemas, Sept 2013
joined:2/25/08
Posted: 12/4/12 at 10:38pm