I think my favorite part is the part about the American Indian [sic] president. "Minorities are scary because they'll treat us as crappy as we treated them, given half the chance!" via Gakwer
I feel bad for the grandson. He's clearly against the changes made to the definition of marriage, yet he as five wives. Is polygamy compulsory in this scenario? I'm surprised he wasn't forced to have an equal number of wives and husbands.
You're missing the scariest undertone of that tale...if Chester Allman (who, btw, obviously is an FTM transexual descendant of Gregg, because the Cher curse somehow passed down) just returned from the Moon Colony...that means somehow, Newt Gingrich was elected president.
The real tragedy is the fact these brave lunar pioneers were denied any communication with Earth. I bet their absentee moon ballots weren't even counted!
I was sitting here thinking that there was a comic book back in the 60s that had a Native American US President, but apparently I was thinking of PREZ in which the first teen President (white) appoints Native American "Eagle Free" as head of the FBI. (Comic was 70s not 60s btw.)
The Oreo rainbow cookie thing ... people (all the negative comments) are ridiculous. I am working on losing weight and trying to stay away from most sweets, but this is really tempting me to go buy some Oreos and hope I can control myself.
Thanks, Matt. I hadn't seen the actual facebook page. (Just looked it up. I'm not on fb and forget that companies have pages that can be viewed publicly.)
I think the haters are finding themselves more and more in the minority with each passing day.
I realize there is so much stupidity in Weber's letter that it hardly deserves a response.
But could we once and for all stop with the bull$hit about how marriage has had the same "definition" for 200 or 2,000 years (depending on who is making up the nonsense).
A century ago, a wife was a virtual ward of her husband in most states, unable to transact business without his consent (and, of course, unable to vote). As recently as the 1950s, a wife who did anything but stay home and keep house was the object of considerable social scorn. (Not that there's anything wrong with being a housewife; it's damn hard work. The point is it is no longer compulsory for married women.)
When I was a kid, marriage was such an inviolable contract that even in a reasonably progressive state like New York, adultery was more or less the only justification for divorce. That's a very different "definition" of marriage than today's contract, which can be terminated at any time fairly easily by mutual agreement.
The "definition" of marriage has changed enormously even in my lifetime (legally and socially), so this nonsense about violating centuries-old traditions needs to stop.
joined:9/16/07
Posted: 6/26/12 at 02:52pm