Without tops where wouldn't be bottoms and without bottoms their wouldn't be tops, and if neither existed guess what? We'd all be having sex with ourselves so stop with the b.s. STFU and enjoy the pictures.
Well since you've asked CATS I will answer your question from my personal perspective. That is clearly a deep personal decision that is made from within yourself. There are some men that prefer to give and then there are those that prefer to receive and then there are those that get pleasure from giving and receiving. There is nothing wrong with any of these preferences.
I hate when we as homosexual men make this an issue. It shouldn't be this way and those that do have some deep rooted identity problems they clearly need to address.
As a fortunate 42 year old homosexual man who has been out and proud for the better part of 20 years now I can honestly say that I am comfortable in my own skin, how I identify myself and my personal preferences and I make no apologies.
Twinbelters, Funny thing, I was doing a thread search for Breaking Bad and up pops a picture of Bruce Campbell from this thread.
I watch Burn Notice primarily for The Bruce. (Straight women love him too.)
Bruce stars as Elvis in a cheap-looking, low budget flick called Bubba Ho-Tep. It is so much fun, Bruce is great! I think Ossie Davis must have lost a bet, because for some strange reason he's in it too.
I used to have a bigtime crush on baseball player Todd Zeile. In his career he played for 11 teams. Loyalty was not his specialty..ah well...
All right, Chatty Queens, lets leave who's a**hole is whose alone for one second and gaze on Liam Neeson looking poetic and doable. Hell, I'd still do him now. A sexy Irish accent AND he's reportedly hung like a clydesdale! Siiiiiigh.
"I am not saying it like a it's a bad thing, it's just that the guys who love the hunks are more likely to be bottoms."
There's more to sexuality than just who/what type you're attracted to. The kind of person that someone is attracted to has NOTHING to do with what kinds of sex they enjoy engaging in.
You guys are too funny. I don't know anything about tops and bottoms, but as far as I'm concerned as a straight chick, sometimes I'm on top and sometimes I'm not. Is it really so different?
Sort of. There's the stigma attached that the one on top is the more dominate or the more masculine of the two. Even if the bottom happens to be on top.
"You guys are too funny. I don't know anything about tops and bottoms, but as far as I'm concerned as a straight chick, sometimes I'm on top and sometimes I'm not. Is it really so different?"
Yes. In gay terms even if you are on top you are still the bottom if you are the one with a d*ck in your a**.
joined:10/9/08
Posted: 6/21/10 at 08:09pm